Hubstaff vs uAttend: Full Comparison
Hubstaff tracks remote and field workers with screenshots, activity levels, and GPS, then pays them out. uAttend puts a physical time clock at your door.
Free to start. No credit card needed.
Our quick verdict on both tools
Pick Hubstaff if your team works from laptops in different places and you need proof of work plus automated payroll. Pick uAttend if your staff clock in at a physical location and you want hardware at the door backed by a simple cloud dashboard.
Start tracking freeWhat this comparison covers
Hubstaff and uAttend are both time tracking tools, compared here side by side so you can see how they differ.
If neither fits, TimeTracker is worth a look too. It skips monitoring and hardware clocks and instead ties tracked hours straight to project budgets, approvals, and client invoices.
Compare the two products at a glance
Both tools solve time tracking. Here is what each one includes, side by side.
Hubstaff
Pairs time tracking with built-in workforce monitoring (screenshots, activity levels, GPS geofencing) and automated payroll payouts.
- Best for
- Distributed teams, agencies, and field service businesses that need proof-of-work tracking tied to payroll.
- Pricing
- No free plan, 14-day trial only. Billed annually: Starter $4.99, Grow $7.50, Team $10 per seat a month, all with a 2 seat minimum, and Enterprise $25. So the real floor is $9.98 a month, not $4.99.
- Start/stop timers with idle detection
- Optional screenshots with blur option
- Activity levels from keyboard/mouse use
- GPS and geofencing, a paid Team-plan add-on
- Automated payroll payouts
- App and URL usage tracking
uAttend
Sells its own line of physical time clock hardware (fingerprint, facial recognition, badge) alongside cloud software, priced by employee count.
- Best for
- Businesses that want physical time clock hardware paired with a cloud dashboard.
- Pricing
- Tiered by employee count: about $29/mo (1-9 employees) up to $195/mo (100+). Hardware clocks sold separately from about $139. A plan covers 2 clocks and 1 admin, with extra clocks $12/mo and extra admins $8/mo. Payroll is a separate add-on from $5 a person a month.
- Fingerprint, facial recognition, badge clocks
- Mobile app with GPS on punch in/out
- Cloud dashboard for timesheets and PTO
- Touch-tone phone punching option
- Text and email missed-punch alerts
- Multi-location support
- Shift scheduling, and its own payroll add-on
See how they stack up
Pricing, best fit, and top strengths for both tools, side by side.
Pricing checked 2026-07-31. Confirm current pricing on each vendor's site.
Which one fits your team
Choose Hubstaff when…
Your team works remotely or across time zones and you need proof of work.
Optional screenshots and activity levels from keyboard and mouse use give you evidence of work done, not just hours logged.
You want payroll to run straight from tracked hours, with no separate step.
Automated payroll payouts turn approved hours into a payment without exporting to another tool first.
You manage field staff and need to confirm they were at the job site.
GPS tracking and geofenced job sites confirm a worker clocked in from the right location, not just at the right time.
You have a mix of office staff and field workers on one plan.
Hubstaff covers both desk-based monitoring and GPS-based field tracking in the same platform, so you are not running two systems.
You want to see which apps and websites your team uses during work hours.
App and URL usage tracking shows where time goes on a computer, which a physical clock cannot show you.
Choose uAttend when…
Your staff punch in at a physical location, like a shop, warehouse, or office front desk.
Fingerprint, facial recognition, and badge clocks give on-site staff a fast, familiar way to punch in without a phone or laptop.
You do not want screenshots or activity monitoring on staff computers.
uAttend tracks clock-in and clock-out times, not what is happening on a screen, which feels less invasive to many employees.
You want a phone option for staff who cannot reach a computer.
Touch-tone phone punching lets a worker clock in from any phone line, useful for sites without smart devices.
You run more than one location and want one dashboard over all of them.
Multi-location support rolls up timesheets and PTO from every site into one cloud dashboard.
You want text or email alerts the moment a shift is missed.
Missed-punch alerts flag a no-show fast, so a manager can react the same day instead of finding out at payroll.
Popular features
Employee time tracking your team will actually use
One click starts a timer, or people type hours in by hand. Every entry ties to a client, project, and task, so the record stays clean.
Explore Time Tracking→Bill for every hour you earn
Mark each entry billable or non-billable while you work. Approved hours roll straight into reports you can bill from.
Explore Billing→See where the time really goes
Break hours down by client, project, and team member. Find the work that pays off and the projects that run over.
Explore Reports & Dashboards→Use cases this solves
Frequently asked questions
- Which costs less, Hubstaff or uAttend?
- Hubstaff starts at about $4.99 a user a month, billed annually, with no permanent free plan. uAttend prices by employee count instead of per seat, from about $29 a month for 1 to 9 employees up to $195 a month for 100 or more, plus separate hardware costs. For a broader price comparison across the category, see the billing page.
- Does uAttend need special hardware?
- Yes, if you want on-site punching. uAttend sells fingerprint, facial recognition, and badge clocks starting around $139, on top of the software subscription. Hubstaff needs no hardware at all, since staff clock in from a desktop app or phone. If your team never sets foot in one location, see how remote-friendly time tracking usually works without a physical clock.
- Does Hubstaff take screenshots of employees?
- It can. Hubstaff offers optional screenshots with a blur option, plus activity levels from keyboard and mouse use. uAttend does not do this at all, since it only records clock-in and clock-out events. Teams that want hours tracked without any screen monitoring often look at lighter time tracking tools instead.
- Can either tool run payroll for me?
- Hubstaff has automated payroll payouts built in, so approved hours turn into a payment without a separate step. uAttend does not run payroll itself. Its cloud dashboard tracks timesheets and PTO, and you export that data to a payroll provider. Neither approach includes billing to clients, which is a different job than paying your own staff.
- Which tool fits a hybrid team of office and field staff?
- Hubstaff covers both cases in one platform: desk-based monitoring for office staff and GPS tracking with geofencing for field workers. uAttend can also work for hybrid teams, since its mobile app supports GPS on punch in and out, but its core strength is the physical clock for on-site staff. Either way, once hours are tracked, utilization tracking helps you see how that time actually gets used.
- Is Hubstaff's activity monitoring a problem for employees?
- It can feel invasive to some staff, since it tracks activity levels and can capture screenshots. This is a real tradeoff of Hubstaff's approach. uAttend avoids this entirely, since it only logs clock-in and clock-out times, not what happens on a screen in between. Teams weighing this tradeoff sometimes look at non-billable time tracking tools with a lighter touch.
- Does uAttend support more than one business location?
- Yes. uAttend has multi-location support, rolling up timesheets and PTO from every site into one dashboard. Hubstaff supports distributed teams too, but through remote GPS and geofenced job sites rather than fixed clock hardware at each site. Businesses billing clients across multiple locations may also want client reporting to share hours by site.
- How reliable is uAttend's hardware and app?
- Reviewers generally call uAttend affordable and easy to learn, with responsive support, though some report the fingerprint scanners misreading at times. Hubstaff, being software-only, has no hardware to fail. Either way, reliable time tracking data matters most when it feeds into payroll.
- Which tool works better for a fully remote team with no office?
- Hubstaff is the better fit for a fully remote team, since it was built around monitoring people who are not in one place, with screenshots and activity levels. uAttend is built around a physical clock, so a team with no shared location gets less value from it. For fully distributed billing teams, expense tracking often matters as much as clocking hours.
- What if neither Hubstaff nor uAttend fits how I bill clients?
- Both tools focus on tracking and paying your own staff, not on turning tracked hours into a client invoice. If you bill clients by the hour and want project budgets, approvals, and invoicing built around the same hours, it is worth looking at a wider set of options on our Hubstaff alternatives page page, which covers tools built specifically for that workflow.
Still deciding between Hubstaff and uAttend?
Both tools solve a real problem: monitoring remote work or clocking in on-site. Match the tool to where your team works before you commit.
See more comparisons